hand icon with "End collective Punishment in BC Schools"
scales of justice

We can meet again

If they say: Everyone gets a 30-minute IEP meeting—those are the rules.

Say: Consultation must match the child’s needs. A fixed 30-minute block doesn’t meet the legal standard when deeper discussion is required.

Legal grounding: Hewko affirms that consultation must allow time for real input, timely info-sharing, and serious consideration of family concerns (2006 BCSC 1638, para. 361).

Schools sometimes set strict limits on IEP meeting duration—offering a single 30-minute slot, or skipping meetings altogether in favour of sending home a prewritten plan. This approach treats consultation as a checkbox rather than a meaningful dialogue. But consultation is a legal requirement, not an administrative courtesy—and it must allow enough time to address the actual complexity of a child’s needs.

Key takeaways

  1. Meaningful consultation adapts to need
    Some students require multiple meetings, mid-year updates, or collaborative problem-solving. A standard time limit cannot meet legal requirements if it prevents meaningful participation.
  2. Timing must support actual dialogue
    Families must have time to share concerns, receive timely information, and have their input seriously considered. Speed and standardisation do not excuse superficial process.
  3. Rigid time caps violate the Human Rights Code
    When schools pre-limit consultation to save time or resources, they create a barrier to equitable access—especially for students with complex profiles.

Learn more
Part 4: Duty to Accommodate – Duty to Consult
by Kim Block, Speaking Up BC

More tips for families