hand icon with "End collective Punishment in BC Schools"
Girl at library

The ABCs of engineered scarcity

A learning module for educators, caregivers, and community members resisting austerity logic in public systems.

Engineered scarcity operates like a slow haemorrhage, draining public education of the resources it owes every child while masking that attrition behind soothing administrative dialects; this primer sets out to rupture that façade by naming, in alphabetical precision, the tactics that normalise deprivation and then blaming those who suffer for failing to thrive in the vacuum.

Each flip-card distils a concept to its linguistic core, unmasks the policy manoeuvre at work, and offers a prompt crafted for immediate deployment—whether in a staff meeting, a parent-teacher conference, or a ministerial briefing—so that readers can replace muted frustration with analytic clarity and strategic resolve. Words are leverage. Use them to prise the machinery open. Enjoy!

A

Allocation framing

The bureaucratic logic that replaces needs-based support with rationing language.

Support isn’t assessed on what a student requires—but on how many “hours,” “units,” or “categories” can be allocated.

Ask: Who benefits when we stop talking about need?

B

Bandwidth taxation

The cognitive toll of navigating broken systems.

Families must absorb administrative work, emotional labour, and policy interpretation just to secure the basics.

Name it: this is not disorganisation—it’s designed overwhelm.

C

Compliance discourse

The rebranding of support needs as behaviour problems.

When a student cannot meet an expectation and is punished instead of scaffolded.

Reframe: Is this noncompliance—or unmet access needs?

D

Deferral

The perpetual postponement of meaningful change.

Committees, consultations, and ‘pilot projects’ delay action, all while children suffer.

Delay is not neutral. Delay is harm.

E

Efficiency fetish

The worship of doing more with less—no matter the cost to humans.

Efforts that take time, care, or complexity are dismissed as inefficient.

Challenge: Who defines efficiency, and what are they leaving out?

G

Gatekeeping

The use of policy, process, or politeness to deny access.

Support exists—but only if you say the right words, ask the right way, or wait long enough.

Demand: Systems should meet people, not test them.

I

Individualisation

The tactic of treating systemic failures as personal shortcomings.

When the system fails, families are told to ‘build resilience.’

Resilience is not a substitute for rights.

L

Lottery logic

The idea that fairness means randomness, not adequacy.

Access is framed as luck: to get an EA, a placement, or safety.

If you need a lottery, the system has already failed.

M

Masking incentives

The pressure on disabled students to appear less disabled to gain inclusion.

Support is withdrawn the moment distress is hidden effectively.

Reminder: Masking is not wellness. It is survival.

N

No Discrimination

The right to equitable education without bias or exclusion.

Discrimination denies access. It punishes difference. It withholds belonging.

Ask: Who is being pushed out, and who is being protected?

N

Normalisation

The quiet embedding of harm as routine.

Oversized caseloads, unpaid labour, constant advocacy—these become ‘just the way it is.’

Expose: What we normalise, we legitimise.

P

Performative equity

The language of justice without its practice.

Diversity statements replace disability access. Inclusion weeks substitute for structural change.

Equity isn’t optics—it’s obligation.

R

Responsibilisation

The political act of offloading system duties onto individuals.

Teachers are told to ‘innovate’ without support. Parents are told to ‘advocate’ endlessly.

Austerity thrives on our unpaid labour.

S

Scarcity ideology

The myth that some must go without because there isn’t enough.

Scarcity pits needs against each other and disguises political choices as inevitabilities.

Ask who benefits from neglecting the individual needs of the child(ren)

T

Triage ethics

The normalisation of forced neglect.

Some students are ‘prioritised.’ Others are quietly abandoned.

Refuse this framing. Dignity is not negotiable.

U

Underprovision

The quiet practice of delivering less than promised, again and again.

It wears people down, until they stop asking for what they need.

Track it. Name it. Break the cycle.

V

Victim narrative

Framing institutions as victims of budget cuts or bureaucracy.

This narrative deflects accountability and centres institutional struggle over student harm.

Ask: who is cast as victim, and whose voice is erased?

W

Workaround economy

Unpaid labour and grassroots fixes that quietly compensate for systemic failure.

A hidden economy of goodwill sustains the system — obscuring chronic underprovision and deferring meaningful reform.

Challenge: which essential services depend on unpaid work, and who ultimately bears the cost?

Z

Zero-sum logic

The belief that resources are fixed, so one person’s gain must come at another’s expense.

Under stress, systems default to zero-sum logic — ignoring how equity-driven investment can grow capacity, not shrink it.

Reframe: Are we dividing a fixed pie—or baking a bigger one?

Districts:

View All Districts

More Resources