hand icon with "End collective Punishment in BC Schools"
Woman with hands over her face and t-shirt says "That Parent"

Revoking recess as a form of collective punishment

This post is part of the Collective Punishment Basics series—a foundational guide for understanding how systemic exclusion shows up in schools and why it causes deep harm to disabled, neurodivergent, and vulnerable children. If you’re just starting to name what feels wrong, this is a place to begin.

I remember watching my child’s small frame shrink beneath the empty swing set—an image that still haunts me.

Why revoking recess is a form of collective punishment

Revoking recess as a disciplinary measure treats every child as culpable—an approach that flies in the face of expert guidance. Recess is, by definition, a scheduled period for unstructured physical activity and play, which experts agree should never be withheld as punishment. Yet too often it is revoked wholesale after a single incident. Such blanket bans ignore individual needs and perpetuate harm under the guise of uniform discipline.

Recess supports self-regulation and executive function

Recess underpins self-regulation—an ability that predicts academic success, school engagement and peer acceptance. It provides crucial moments to practise planning, monitoring and evaluating one’s own actions in a natural context. Free play is similarly essential for children’s physical, mental and social health, offering the unstructured opportunity to navigate challenges, resolve conflicts and build empathy. Without these pauses, children lose vital chances to recharge their executive-function networks.

Disproportionate impact on neurodivergent students

I have seen my child, who thrives in guided movement and social play, shrink away when recess was revoked; shoulders tightened, words faltered as they tried to explain the unmoored anxiety that followed. For neurodivergent learners—particularly those on the autism spectrum—recess can be both sanctuary and skill-building arena. Depriving every child of recess thus disproportionately penalises those who rely on structured breaks to manage sensory input and practise social regulation.

The right to play and learn

The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child enshrines play as a fundamental right. Even fifteen minutes of recess can enhance classroom behaviour and peer empathy. Schools must recognise recess as indispensable for self-regulation, social learning and sensory integration; targeted strategies can replace punitive bans, honouring every child’s right to play and learn.

Join the movement

We call on educators, families and policy-makers to end collective punishment in our schools. Sign our petition and demand that no child’s need for movement be treated as a fault line for uniform discipline.

  • This broke me: a parent’s experience of school advocacy

    This broke me: a parent’s experience of school advocacy

    Parenting is not a monolith. Neither is disability. Every family walks a different path, shaped by bodies, resources, identities, and institutions. This piece reflects one perspective—mine—as a disabled parent navigating systemic harm, health collapse, and the fierce love that remains. It is not…